Given this new information, authorities or individuals who grant permission for the siting of these Masts near to residential areas, would be deliberately subjecting people to energies which are known to cause disturbances in human energy fields and could, therefore, over time lead to illness and disease. This would mean anybody responsible for granting permission for these Masts to be erected near residential housing and public places, would be guilty of depriving people of their natural right to maintain, restore and enjoy good physical health.
As we are witnessing in other parts of the world, litigation cases are increasing exponentially in the war against these phone masts and it is only a matter of time before lawyers and barristers in the UK join this 'money train'.
An article from the Daily Mail detailed the number of cancer clusters around mobile phone masts, and this cannot be a coincidence, as the authorities would like us to believe. It is difficult to imagine how the NRPB can continue to maintain that an investigative exposure level of 10000mW/cm2 (100W/m2) is safe when in 1995 the New Zealand Environment Court (as the Planning Tribunal) in the case of MacIntyre vs. BellSouth set a level of 2mW/cm2 as a precautionary approach - a level 5000 times less than that set by the NRPB!
Just what are the authorities willingly subjecting people to, and just how much damage to health has been caused to date, and will continue to be caused in the future if common sense does not prevail over greed and profit? These authorities cannot be allowed to continue to use human beings as guinea pigs.
The information presented in this brief article may be something new to people, and if it is, I trust you will look into the matter further and demand the updating of the NRPB's antiquated guidelines in accordance and in line with other more open minded countries.